|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WATER RESOURCES
AND IRRIGATION
|
|
|
|
>
Research Programs
> Work
Plan
> Activities
in AP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Arabian Peninsula (AP) is one of the major arid regions of the world. It
is characterized by low and variable rainfall, high evaporation rates (especially
during summer), and limited renewable water resources. Annual precipitation
is usually much less than potential crop water use so that, with few
 |
| Reference
evapotranspiration in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia, showing
the typically high irrigation rates required along with the low, usually
negligible, contribution from rainfall. |
exceptions, all arable crop
production requires irrigation. Although there are some surface water sources
in the form of dams, springs or occasional flow in river beds (wadis), the
major water source, particularly for agriculture, is groundwater. The other
important source of water, particularly for municipalities located on the
Gulf, is desalination and, increasingly, recycled water (RW, treated waste
water). Desalination and RW are commonly used for domestic, municipal and
industrial purposes,
but are too expensive for the
economic production of most agricultural field crops. Despite water scarcity,
some irrigation systems that historically developed or were adopted in the
AP were sustainable, and some of them
are still in use. Examples include aflaj in Oman which tap groundwater or
springs recharged by runoff from mountains, and spate irrigation in Yemen
which captures wadi flow during the infrequent runoff events. However, these
systems do not account for much of the current irrigated land total. They
remain important, however, as a potential source of indigenous knowledge.
Groundwater generally receives limited recharge due to the very low precipitation,
and is currently being used faster than it is recharged in many areas. The
salinity of the groundwater varies from good to poor, and is increasing
in some areas due to excess abstraction. The renewable supply of water per
capita is amongst the lowest in the world, and its wise use is imperative
for long term sustainability. of this precious resource. As agriculture
is by far the largest user of water in the Arabian Peninsula, any conservation
and rationalization of the water it consumes will have a major impact on
water resources and sustainability. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
Programs |
|
|
<
Top
- Research Programs
> Work Plan
> Activitie
in AP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-farm
water management
Water use efficiency is very much influenced by
irrigation management. Irrigation in excess of crop water requirements is
a waste of water and can cause other inefficiencies, such as the waste of
energy required to pump the excess water, and the leaching of agricultural
chemicals out of the root zone. The application of excess irrigation, sometimes
in large amounts, is common. Improved irrigation scheduling and monitoring
of system performance can do much to improve performance. For example, the
introduction of estimates of crop water requirements based on meteorological
measurements from automated weather stations is an approach being investigated.
Irrigated forage production
Irrigated forages are major consumers of water in the Arabian
Peninsula. This program aims, in cooperation with the Rangeland component
of APRP, to find ways of increasing water use efficiency through the development
of alternative production systems. The major thrust is to investigate whether
indigenous forage species can be used, under irrigation, to substitute for
the conventional forage species, such as Rhodes grass, while at the same
time providing higher water use efficiency. Two species, Cenchrus ciliaris
and Coelachyrum piercii, have been targeted for research as they show good
potential for use in irrigated forage production systems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work
Plan |
|
|
|
<
Top
<
Research
Programs
- Work Plan
> Activitie
in AP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MANAGEMENT
AND UTILIZATION OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF IRRIGATION WATER |
| Objective
1: |
Improved
water use efficiency and optimal utilization of available water resources
in open field irrigated production systems. |
| |
|
| Output
1: |
Recommendations for appropriate
irrigation, soil and crop management that promote
efficient use of water, economic net benefits to water users
and yield security and
stability. |
Activities:
1.1. Establishment of weather station network including programs for direct
reading from the stations
for the estimation of the crop water
requirement.
| Participating Countries |
All countries |
| ICARDA Scientist(s) |
Ahmed Moustafa, Arash Nejatian and Consultants |
| Contact Scientists |
Bahrain: Hussain
Allaith
Emirates: Abdalla Al Aboudi, Ibrahim
Al Zarouni
Kuwait: Hani Hajeya
Oman: Mahmoud Al Rashidi (Rumais) and
Anwar Bait Fadhil (Salalah)
Qatar: Hassan Abu Sukar
Saudi Arabia: A.Alshankiti, Hani Alrashed
Yemen: Mohamed Abdel Wasie |
1.2. Assessment of utilization of water from small dams and reservoirs in
Yemen (Sana'a and Dhamar)
| Participating Countries |
Yemen |
| ICARDA Scientist(s) |
Ahmed T. Moustafa |
| Contact Scientist(s) |
Khader Atroosh, Abdul Azeez Haider, Abdul
Rab Al-Sururi |
| Output
2: |
Evaluation of the water
use efficiency of different crops. |
Activities:
2.1. Monitoring soil water depletion under different forages using TDR
| Participating Countries |
Emirates, Qatar, Saudi Arabia |
| ICARDA Scientist(s) |
Ahmed Osman |
| Contact Scientists |
Emirates: Mahdi Tamimi,
Ibrahim Al-Zerooni,
Qatar: Mohamed Ali Hassan
Saudi Arabia: Abdullah Al-Shankiti, Abdullah
Al-Hajoj, A. Al Habib |
| Output
3: |
Evaluation of methods
to use alternative water resources such as brackish water and
treated wastewater. |
Activities:
3.1. Studies of utilization of indigenous fodder crops under irrigation
by Treated Waste Water (TWW)
and comparing to Rhodes grass
| Participating Countries |
Bahrain |
| ICARDA Scientist(s) |
Ahmed Osman |
| Contact Scientists |
Ahmed Awad El-Kariem, Adil Sitri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities
in AP |
|
|
<
Top
<
Research
Programs
<Work
Plan
- Activities
in AP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emirates:
 |
Research was initiated
in the Emirates to assess the performance of indigenous forage grasses
under irrigation. A line-source sprinkler system was established at
the research station in Al-Dhaid, in Sharjah emirate. The system applies
a gradient of irrigation, with maximum rates close to the line, and
a rate that reduces with distance from the line. The results are preliminary,
but do show that the indigenous species (Cenchrus ciliaris, Coelachyrum
piercii, and Lasirius scindicus) are very drought tolerant,
and capable of producing under very limited irrigation. Under full
irrigation, Cenchrus ciliaris is at least as productive as
the widely grown Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana). There are also
data on the nutritional value of these forages from research conducted
under the rangeland component that show that the indigenous species
are generally superior.
The correct amount of water to apply is largely determined by the
weather. In the Emirates, an automated weather station has been installed
at the Desert Park in Sharjah. The data from this weather station
is used to estimate potential evapotranspiration, and thus crop water
use, using standard and widely accepted methods. These methods are
often incorporated into computer programs, and have been programmed
into a spreadsheet that is being used to schedule irrigation at the
indigenous forage experiment at Al-Dhaid, UAE. The data from the weather
station are transferred into the spreadsheet, which uses them to estimate
daily ET0, using the Penman Monteith method that has become the de
facto standard method for such estimates. Also important in irrigation
scheduling are measurements of the amount of water applied, and of
soil water content. These measurements are especially important for
research. |
Kuwait:
|
In Kuwait, an experiment was conducted by Kuwait Institute for Scientific
Research (KISR) at their research station in Sulaibiya to determine
WUE of five forage species (Medicago sativa, Lolium perene, Panicum
maximum, Cenchrus ciliaris, and Chloris gayana), as well
as four mixtures of grasses with the legume alfalfa (Medicago sativa).
Poor germination and weed competition adversely affected the results.
However, Rye grass (Lolium perene) and the Rye grass/alfalfa
mixture produced the best results, although yields and WUE were considerably
lower than in other locations. |
Oman:
A study was conducted at the experiment station in Rumais to compare
production of 3 varieties of Rhodes grass, 2 varieties of alfalfa
and 3 different alfalfa/Rhodes grass mixtures, all under full irrigation.
Solid-set sprinkler irrigation was used, and was scheduled using data
from a weather station. Results are shown in table below.
| |
Statistical
Analysis |
F-Test
|
| |
Treatment |
** (LSD at p=0.05= 0.137 kg/m3)
|
| |
Cuts |
** (LSD at p=0.05= 0.168 kg/ m3)
|
| |
Interaction |
** (LSD at p=0.05= 0.474 kg/ m3)
|
| |
CV% |
19.61
|
| |
+
For Rhodes grass varieties means are computed for 8 cuts
* Values with similar letter(s) are not significantly different
at p=0.05 |
|
Saudi Arabia:
|
As part of APRP Phase I, Saudi Arabia purchased an ‘Enviroscan’ unit
for measuring soil water content at fixed locations and depths within
a field, and a TDR system with both handheld and access tube probes
was purchased in UAE. Oman and Saudi Arabia also use neutron probes. |
Yemen:
 |
| A
comparison of yield of Sorghum, Cowpea, and their equal mixture,
in Yemen |
Studies were conducted
in the south of the country, at Lahej, to determine yield and water
use efficiency of sorghum and cowpea, two important forages in the
region. The experiment was conducted under surface irrigation, which
is the predominant method in the country. The studies were conducted
over two years, with three cuts per year. In the first year, full
irrigation was applied, while in the second year, full and deficit
irrigation were applied. The deficit irrigation treatments corresponded
to 75%, 50% and 25% of the full irrigation (100%) treatment. Results
show that yields of sorghum declined with reduced irrigation, as would
be expected. However, the decrease in yield was less than the decrease
in irrigation, implying greater water use efficiency. The yield of
cowpea was lower than sorghum, as expected. However, reduced irrigation
did not appear to reduce yield. Results for the mixture were between
those of the two crops. During the second year however, yields of
both crops were lower than in the previous year. One danger of deficit
irrigation, that of salinity build up due to lack of leaching, needs
further investigation if opportunities to increase water use efficiency
and/or reduce non-renewable water use will be investigated.
Water of low salinity, such as from spate irrigation, may be well
suited for a deficit irrigation strategy in Yemen. For example, a
single spate irrigation of half the full amount on twice the area
may well result in higher total production than the existing system,
in which upstream producers tend to receive more than the crop can
use, while downstream users receive much less.
Figure above shows the water use efficiency (Yield/water applied)
of sorghum for the different treatments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|