Why the small ruminant sector is growing number of factors are leading to the growth of the small ruminant sector in WANA. Improvements in services such as free vaccination and availability of veterinary medicines are contributing to better health and reduced mortality of flocks. Governments also intervene during drought periods to assist farmers through distribution of subsidized animal feeds, rescheduling of loans, and investments in water development and animal health. In the 1990s, several countries implemented measures and policies aimed at limiting the social and economic damage caused by droughts. These included emergency purchases and distribution of concentrate feed to livestock owners; veterinary measures, water development, and access to credit and debt relief. Feed imports and use of crop residues as feed are contributing to the improvement in nutritional status of small ruminants in WANA. Though feed subsidies have been largely eliminated in recent years, producers, especially those with collateral, can still receive subsidized government loans to buy feed. Also, producers are now able to effectively collect and utilize crop residues, which have reduced such drought-mitigation practices as culling of animals. The reduced reliance on natural grazing and increased utilization of crop residues and purchased feed has also led to the development of intensive and semi-intensive production systems such as lamb fattening.
A significant factor in the trends of small ruminant production is income growth in the Gulf countries which has led to a rapid increase in meat consumption. In addition, the region has experienced rapid population growth and positive changes in average incomes. The population of WANA grew from 400 million in 1981 to more than 640 million in 2000. The increase in urbanization resulting from this high population and income growth has brought changes in dietary patterns in favor of meat consumption. This is because consumers in urban areas have more options to diversify their diets and are, therefore, likely to consume more meat and milk products. The environmental costs The increase in small ruminant production, however, is taking place at a heavy cost to the environment. High stocking rates have contributed to natural resource degradation, mainly vegetation and soil degradation and the loss of plant biodiversity. The resulting land degradation is increasing the pace of desertification as growing animal numbers compete for grazing resources. Desertification and soil degradation in WANA are affecting at least 709 million hectares of rangelands and are reaching alarming levels, particularly in Afghanistan, Algeria, Ethiopia, Iran, Morocco, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Turkey. How the poor are losing out The increased demand for small ruminant meat in WANA offers both opportunities and challenges to small producers. In the past, most countries in the region imported small ruminant products from within WANA due to competitiveness, proximity, consumer preferences, established trade networks, and religious and cultural familiarity. However, many countries in WANA now import small ruminant meat from Australia, Bulgaria, Hungary, New Zealand and Romania. WANA countries currently hold about 61% of the market within the region, an indicator that local exporters are not taking full advantage of the expanding regional market and may even further lose market share if the trend continues. Among the reasons for this decreasing share of the market are small ruminant health-related trade restrictions, poor market infrastructure, and lack of information about the dynamics of export markets and lack of polices to effectively respond to export market requirements. Gulf importers, for instance, say that livestock from Australia and New Zealand arrive in much better physical shape than those from the horn of African countries because of better handling. In addition, many small ruminant producers in WANA use nomadic, semi-nomadic or transhumance production systems which rely on the use of common rangelands for feed resources and living space. Because rangelands are state-owned, producers have no incentives to invest and improve their livestock productivity. Therefore, extensive production systems with low productivity dominate. These systems are relatively less competitive. In order for the poor small ruminant producers to compete favorably on the increasingly open market, a number of changes need to be made in policies, production systems and marketing. ICARDA has been studying various options with the national agricultural research systems in the region. Technology options
Policy options At the national level, policy action is needed on measures that stimulate the adoption of productivity-enhancing practices and measures that increase investment in the vast rangelands on which many livestock producers rely. Policies that encourage organized communities to collectively manage their grazing areas could have a positive impact. Policy actions are also needed from exporting countries to assure importing countries that livestock production meets the required standards with minimum risks to human health. At the regional level, common polices and coordinated efforts on animal health-related regulations and common livestock trade rules are essential to improve trade and producers' income. Many of the small ruminant producers who live in the marginal dry areas have no or little landholdings, which makes them ineligible for credit from formal sources. Informal credit from traders is often the only source of capital with very high interest rates. New institutional reforms, such as community-based micro-credit that improve the access to capital, should be investigated. Conclusions Increasing population, urbanization and incomes in WANA are leading to a growth in demand for animal products, which opens opportunities for poor farmers in domestic and export markets. However, these farmers face the challenge of producing for a competitive market. There is a need to focus on improving production and marketing infrastructure to enable small livestock producers retain a reasonable share of the market.
|