![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| S E E D I N F O | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Official Newsletter of the WANA Seed Network
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No. 29,
July 2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PDF File (378
KB)
---------------------- Subscribe ---------------------- E-mail & Address ---------------------- Back Issues ---------------------- Seed Home ---------------------- ICARDA Home |
Research Notes____________________________________________________________ Removal of Common Bunt Spores from Wheat Seed Lots
by Brush Cleaning Abstract
Figure 2 shows that the effect of the treatment on seed vigor mainly depends on the duration of treatment, but not on the amount of seed in the brush. Therefore, to be effective the seed should be treated within a short period of time with a low quantity of seed.
Figure 3 shows the result of an experiment where the seed lots were treated in continuous flow. The figure shows that 97% of the spores in the seed lot was removed by most treatments, but if the capacity of the cleaner exceeds 750 kg h-1, the effect of the treatment decreases. Air screen cleaning combined with brush cleaning reduces the number of spores in the raw seed lot by 99.5%. None of the treatments with continuous flow significantly affected the vigor of the seed lot (data not presented). Brush cleaners are normally installed at the beginning of the cleaning line in seed plants, as the normal function of the brushes are to release the true seed from husk and stalk. Bunt spores can be found in the seed lot both as free spores and in bunt balls (sori), each containing millions of spores. These bunt balls can be gently removed by air screen cleaning as the density is lower than true seed. However, without air screen cleaning, the bunt balls present in the seed lot will brake by the brush cleaner, releasing myriad of spores, which also need to be removed by the brush. This is the likely explanation why the efficacy of the brush cleaner increases considerably after the air screen cleaning. Therefore, it is essential that the brush cleaner is installed at the end of the cleaning line, if the purpose is to remove spores from the seed lot.
In Denmark, the threshold for bunt contamination in untreated seed lots is 10 spores g-1 (~0,5 spore seed-1) which is quite low compared to other European countries. In the experiment presented in Figure 1, the number of spores was reduced from 230,000 spores g-1 in the raw seed lot to 1,356-2,067 spores g-1 after the seed is cleaned by an air screen cleaner and brush-cleaner which could still exceeds the current Danish threshold for bunt contamination. The efficacy of the cleaning is difficult to assess at the low contamination rates, as the threshold is close to the detection level. If the cleaning efficacy of 99.8% is achieved by combined air screen and brush cleaning and is assumed to be independent of contamination level, it means that theoretically seed lots with contamination of less than 5,000 spores g-1 can be expected to meet the current Danish threshold level after cleaning, while seed lots above 5,000 spores g-1 is still likely to exceed the threshold after treatment. The same principle goes for other seed treatments, and cleaning seems to have the same or better efficacy than most chemical treatments. In Sweden, for example seed lots exceeding 1,000 spores g-1 cannot be certified for sowing, even with a chemical treatment. The technology is likely to have a similar effect against seed pathogens contaminating the seed surface. These include smut diseases like dwarf bunt (T. contraversa) in wheat, covered smut (Ustilago hordei) in barley, and stem smut in rye (Urocystis occulta), and contaminations of witch weed (Striga hermonthica). However this needs to be confirmed in future. Conclusion The air screen cleaning combined with brush cleaning can reduce the number of bunt spores in a seed lot by 99.8% without reducing the seed vigor. Therefore, seed lots contaminated with a limited number of bunt spores can be cleaned and used without chemical treatment and still produce a healthy crop. This will be of special interest in organic farming and other systems where chemical treatment is not possible due to legal, environmental or economic reasons. Acknowledgement The author wishes to thank Westrup A/S for providing the equipment for the experiments and DARCOF for financial support. References
Note1: Agrologica, Houvej 51, DK-9550 Mariager, Denmark; Tel: ++4555813518; E-mail: borgen@agrologica.dk, Website: http://www.agrologica.dk |
||||||||||||||||||||||