S E E D    I N F O
Official Newsletter of the WANA Seed Network
No. 29, July 2005
PDF File (378 KB)
----------------------
Subscribe
----------------------
E-mail & Address
----------------------
Back Issues
----------------------
Seed Home
----------------------
ICARDA Home

Research Notes____________________________________________________________
Short communication of practical oriented research or relevant information in agriculture or seed technology are presented in this section.

Removal of Common Bunt Spores from Wheat Seed Lots by Brush Cleaning
by
Anders Borgen
1

Abstract
A brush air cleaner can be used to remove spores of common bunt from wheat seed lots. It is demonstrated that a combined use of conventional cleaning followed by brush cleaning removes 99.8% of the spores in a seed lot. The efficacy of the treatment is comparable with the best chemical treatments available on the market to prevent seed-borne transmission.

Introduction
Common bunt caused by Tilletia carries or T. foetida is the most commonly prevalent seed-borne disease of wheat worldwide. The pathogen infects wheat seedlings just after sowing before the plant emerges from the soil. The wheat seed per se could be healthy at the time of sowing, but could be infected from spores resting on the seed surface or in the soil. Seed contamination, however, is found to be by far the most significant source of infection (Borgen, 2000).

The common bunt in infected seed lots can be controlled by killing the spores with chemicals or heat treatment, by preventing infection using different agronomic practices (use of resistant varieties, adjusting sowing time) or by removing the spores from the seed lot through cleaning (Borgen, 2004).

In another study, Bechel et al (1998) reported that only a small fraction of the spores of the closely related bunt species (T. contraversa) end up in the flour, while the majority are removed when cleaning the seed before or during milling process. However, there is little information available about the fate of the spores during seed cleaning for sowing purposes. This article reports the results of an experiment dealing with cleaning of a seed lot contaminated with common bunt spores.

Materials and Methods
A field containing one common bunt (T. tritici) infected plant 1m-2 was harvested with a combine harvester. After harvest the seed lot was cleaned using three treatments: (i) air screen cleaner, (ii) brush cleaner (ø=400mm) (Anonymous, 2005), and (iii) combined air screen cleaner and brush cleaner. After air screen cleaning the seed lot still contained weed seeds and inert matter which could be improved by cleaning with a second air screen cleaner or gravity table.

The air stream in the brush cleaner was modified during the experiment compared with the standard operation and the data presented shows the optimal adjustment. The contamination of bunt spores was estimated by counting spore in a haemocytometer as described by Keitrieber (1984). The effect on seed vigor was estimated by the emergence of 200 seeds, germinated in a sand test planted at 10°C. The emergence was assessed on the 13th day after sowing.

Results and Discussion
After harvest, the contamination of bunt spores in the seed lot was 230,000 spores g-1. The cleaning of the seed lot with the air-screen cleaner alone reduced the number of spores by 69.4% whereas in comparison the brush cleaner alone reduced the number of spores by 83.9%. However, if the seed lot was first cleaned by air screen cleaner, and then cleaned by the brush cleaner the effect was significantly improved. .

Figures 1 and 2 show the results of an experiment, where the seed was treated in a batch and the treatment duration was controlled precisely. Figure 1 shows that the longer the seed is treated, the higher the effect of the treatment on reducing the spore contamination (15 vs 60 seconds). However, it shows that the larger the quantity of seed, the lower the efficacy in removing the spore contamination (1 versus 4 kg seed).

Figure 1. The effect of brush cleaning on bunt spore contamination in a batch treatment

Figure 2 shows that the effect of the treatment on seed vigor mainly depends on the duration of treatment, but not on the amount of seed in the brush. Therefore, to be effective the seed should be treated within a short period of time with a low quantity of seed.

Figure 2: Effect of brush cleaning on seed vigor

Figure 3 shows the result of an experiment where the seed lots were treated in continuous flow. The figure shows that 97% of the spores in the seed lot was removed by most treatments, but if the capacity of the cleaner exceeds 750 kg h-1, the effect of the treatment decreases. Air screen cleaning combined with brush cleaning reduces the number of spores in the raw seed lot by 99.5%. None of the treatments with continuous flow significantly affected the vigor of the seed lot (data not presented).

Brush cleaners are normally installed at the beginning of the cleaning line in seed plants, as the normal function of the brushes are to release the true seed from husk and stalk. Bunt spores can be found in the seed lot both as free spores and in bunt balls (sori), each containing millions of spores. These bunt balls can be gently removed by air screen cleaning as the density is lower than true seed. However, without air screen cleaning, the bunt balls present in the seed lot will brake by the brush cleaner, releasing myriad of spores, which also need to be removed by the brush. This is the likely explanation why the efficacy of the brush cleaner increases considerably after the air screen cleaning. Therefore, it is essential that the brush cleaner is installed at the end of the cleaning line, if the purpose is to remove spores from the seed lot.

Figure 3. The effect of brush cleaning on bunt spore contamination in a continuous flow treatment

In Denmark, the threshold for bunt contamination in untreated seed lots is 10 spores g-1 (~0,5 spore seed-1) which is quite low compared to other European countries. In the experiment presented in Figure 1, the number of spores was reduced from 230,000 spores g-1 in the raw seed lot to 1,356-2,067 spores g-1 after the seed is cleaned by an air screen cleaner and brush-cleaner which could still exceeds the current Danish threshold for bunt contamination. The efficacy of the cleaning is difficult to assess at the low contamination rates, as the threshold is close to the detection level. If the cleaning efficacy of 99.8% is achieved by combined air screen and brush cleaning and is assumed to be independent of contamination level, it means that theoretically seed lots with contamination of less than 5,000 spores g-1 can be expected to meet the current Danish threshold level after cleaning, while seed lots above 5,000 spores g-1 is still likely to exceed the threshold after treatment. The same principle goes for other seed treatments, and cleaning seems to have the same or better efficacy than most chemical treatments. In Sweden, for example seed lots exceeding 1,000 spores g-1 cannot be certified for sowing, even with a chemical treatment.

The technology is likely to have a similar effect against seed pathogens contaminating the seed surface. These include smut diseases like dwarf bunt (T. contraversa) in wheat, covered smut (Ustilago hordei) in barley, and stem smut in rye (Urocystis occulta), and contaminations of witch weed (Striga hermonthica). However this needs to be confirmed in future.

Conclusion
The air screen cleaning combined with brush cleaning can reduce the number of bunt spores in a seed lot by 99.8% without reducing the seed vigor. Therefore, seed lots contaminated with a limited number of bunt spores can be cleaned and used without chemical treatment and still produce a healthy crop. This will be of special interest in organic farming and other systems where chemical treatment is not possible due to legal, environmental or economic reasons.

Acknowledgement
The author wishes to thank Westrup A/S for providing the equipment for the experiments and DARCOF for financial support.

References
Anonymous. 2005. Illustration of Westrup brush cleaner (http://www.westrup.com/hasideeng.htm)
Bechtel, D.B., J.D. Wilson, W.D. Eustace, K.C. Behnke, T. Witaker, G.L. Peterson and D.B. Sauer .1999. Fate of dwarf bunt fungus teliospores during milling of wheat into flour. Cereal Chemistry 76(2), 270-275
Borgen, A. 2000. Perennial survival of common bunt (Tilletia tritici) in soil under modern farming practice. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz. 107, 182-188
Borgen, A. 2004. Strategies for regulation of seed-borne diseases in organic farming. Seed Testing International, ISTA News Bulletin 127, 19-21.
Kietreiber, M. 1984. ISTA Handbook on Seed Health Testing: Working Sheet no. 53. Bundesanstalt für Pflanzenbau, Vienna, Austria.

Note1: Agrologica, Houvej 51, DK-9550 Mariager, Denmark; Tel: ++4555813518; E-mail: borgen@agrologica.dk, Website: http://www.agrologica.dk
Editorial Note  |  Wana Seed Network News  |  News and Views
Contributions from Seed Programs and Projects  |  How to  |  Research Notes
Meeting and Courses  |  Literature
International Seed Trade Conference in CWANA Region