|
ven for a parasite, orobanche (Orobanche crenata) is a particularly nasty weed. No known lentil varieties can withstand its attack, and it has painfully brought lentil growing to a complete halt in many Mediterranean regions. Early sowings are particularly at risk from this underground parasite. It attaches its specialized sucking apparatus to the root system of the lentil plant from which it then clandestinely withdraws water, minerals and assimilated nutrients, leaving the plant dry and unproductive. All this takes place before the farmer is able to see the aerial shoots of orobanche in his field. The tiny seeds are produced in enormous numbers in capsules, and can be spread by wind, surface water, or from field to field by equipment. They can remain viable in the soil for 12 years or more, so a severe infestation can mean an end to lentil growing for long periods. Even after extensive screening of lentil germplasm, ICARDA has not yet been able to identify sources of resistance to this flowering parasitic weed. Farmers in south and east Europe, North Africa and West Asia, therefore, tackle it using different practices: • Hand weeding--a time-consuming and labor-intensive process • Delayed sowing--can negatively affect straw and seed yields, especially in dry seasons • Inclusion of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) in the rotation for its apparently adverse effects on seeds of the weed in the soil Now ICARDA has put together an integrated weed management package for testing under field conditions in collaboration with the Syrian national program. Two sites were chosen at Idlib (wet) and Tel Hadya (relatively dry). The package includes two sowing dates (early and normal); three cultivars--Hourani, a Syrian local large, and an early-maturing cultivar adapted to late sowing; and foliar sprays with one of three chemicals. These were imazethapyr, applied either as pre-emergence treatment at a 30 milliliters active ingredient per hectare rate, or as two post-emergence treatments, each at 15 ml ai/ha; imazaquin as two post-emergence treatments each at 7.5 ml ai/ha; or imazapic as two post-emergence treatments, each at a rate of 5 ml ai/ha. Controls were either untreated or weeded twice by hand.
|
|