|
A
Code-of-Conduct Workshop
Jointly Organized by the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock in Afghanistan, ICARDA and FAO |
||||||
|
21
- 23 May 2002
Kabul, Afghanistan |
||||||
|
3.2 Guiding Principles Seed System Support in Stress Situations |
||||||
|
Introduction Guiding
principles 2. It is important that those involved in planning interventions understand the fundamental difference between 'seed' (as a physical input) and 'variety' (germplasm). 3. There is a need to understand the different types of stress, their frequency, scale and extent, and the ways in which they impact on livelihood/agricultural/seed systems. It is important to recognize that seed interventions may not be the most appropriate response to certain types of disaster, and that other types of assistance might be more urgently required. 4. Where seed insecurity exists, it is important to determine whether this is acute or chronic. Acute seed insecurity is brought on by distinct short duration events, such as flood, earthquake, and pest outbreaks, often affecting whole populations over a defined area. Chronic seed insecurity is the result of long-term structural problems that affect specific groups of farmers. It is independent from a disaster event, though might be exacerbated by it. Addressing acute seed insecurity requires emergency (relief) response. Longer-term developmental response is needed in addressing chronic seed insecurity. Chronic seed insecurity cannot be addressed through short-term emergency seed provisioning. 5. A seed security framework offers a useful analytical tool to assist in determining whether seed availability or access is the problem in situations of acute seed insecurity. In general, local seed availability is rarely a problem, but poorer farmers might lack the means to access seed. In Afghanistan, acute seed insecurity might arise from flood, earthquake, pest outbreaks (e.g., locust, sun pest), or following wide-scale population displacement. The table below indicates whether seed availability or access is likely to be a problem in these different situations. |
||||||
|
Flood
|
Earthquake
|
Pests
|
Sudden
Displacement
|
||
|
Availability
|
Local
seed available in some areas for some crops.
|
Crops
might be unaffected but irrigation systems damaged.Seed is available
|
Harvest
and therefore farmers' seed might be totally destroyed in localized areas.
|
Rapid
displacement leads to loss of seed. At time of IDP return, seed might
be available from other communities.
|
|
|
Access
|
Poor
people might lack access.
|
Some
poor farmers lack access.
|
All
fields and farmers affected.
|
Those
who return might have access to seed. Others might need help.
|
|
|
Utilization
|
Some
crops possible, e.g., vegetables.
|
Agricultural
land migth be occupied by IDPs.
|
Quality
of local seed affected.
|
Landmines
might prevent planting.Assistance might be needed for plowing.
|
|
|
Other
comments
|
Other
types of relief assistance might be necessary, e.g., cash for shelter,
etc., or repair of physical infrastructure in isolated areas.
|
Irrigation
systems damaged.Transport difficulties.
|
Direct
control of pest is main requirement, e.g., of sunn pest at milk stage
of crop.
|
Immediate
food availability might be a more serious problem.
|
| 6.
The text below indicates the farmers and/or areas affected by chronic seed
insecurity and examples of the contributing factors.
Socially/economically
marginal farmers Ecological marginal
areas/cropping and farming systems Politically
marginal farmers Appropriate seed system
support should address the contributing factors. Agricultural research and development should continue to build upon past experience and draw upon widely available resources, both internally and externally. Agricultural research is a public good, and requires long-term strategic investment. There is an urgent need to address varietal choice among existing crops, and to consider the testing and promotion of new crops for both food production and for sale. Different breeding systems and other agronomic features will require different approaches to crop development, multiplication, and marketing. The overall philosophy of agricultural development needs to shift from supply side to a demand-driven approach if long-term agricultural growth is to be sustained. Suggested actions include: · For a commercial
seed system to emerge from existing programs Contract growers need training
in marketing and business skills to be able to stand on their feet. 7. Institutional linkages
should be promoted in the longer term among the following stakeholders:
8. Monitoring, assessment and analysis should be built in to both short-term relief and longer-term developmental intervention. Three areas are highlighted:
Market development
Seeds systems, cropping and input delivery
Disasters and relief responses |
|||||||||
| Previous | Next | ||||||||
| Workshop
Report |
Afghanistan Consortium | ICARDA Home | |||||||